From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:53:21 -0400
NFSv4: Make the NFS state model work with the nosharedcache mount option

Consider the case where the user has mounted the remote filesystem
server:/foo on the two local directories /bar and /baz using the
nosharedcache mount option. The files /bar/file and /baz/file are
represented by different inodes in the local namespace, but refer to the
same file /foo/file on the server.
Consider the case where a process opens both /bar/file and /baz/file, then
closes /bar/file: because the nfs4_state is not shared between /bar/file
and /baz/file, the kernel will see that the nfs4_state for /bar/file is no
longer referenced, so it will send off a CLOSE rpc call. Unless the
open_owners differ, then that CLOSE call will invalidate the open state on
/baz/file too.

Conclusion: we cannot share open state owners between two different
non-shared mount instances of the same filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
---

 fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h   |    1 +
 fs/nfs/nfs4state.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h b/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
index dd1aa2b..6c028e7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct nfs_unique_id {
 struct nfs4_state_owner {
 	struct nfs_unique_id so_owner_id;
 	struct nfs_client    *so_client;
+	struct nfs_server    *so_server;
 	struct rb_node	     so_client_node;
 
 	struct rpc_cred	     *so_cred;	 /* Associated cred */
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 873d89d..28551ae 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -156,8 +156,9 @@ static void nfs_free_unique_id(struct rb_root *root, struct nfs_unique_id *id)
 }
 
 static struct nfs4_state_owner *
-nfs4_find_state_owner(struct nfs_client *clp, struct rpc_cred *cred)
+nfs4_find_state_owner(struct nfs_server *server, struct rpc_cred *cred)
 {
+	struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;
 	struct rb_node **p = &clp->cl_state_owners.rb_node,
 		       *parent = NULL;
 	struct nfs4_state_owner *sp, *res = NULL;
@@ -166,6 +167,14 @@ nfs4_find_state_owner(struct nfs_client *clp, struct rpc_cred *cred)
 		parent = *p;
 		sp = rb_entry(parent, struct nfs4_state_owner, so_client_node);
 
+		if (server < sp->so_server) {
+			p = &parent->rb_left;
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (server > sp->so_server) {
+			p = &parent->rb_right;
+			continue;
+		}
 		if (cred < sp->so_cred)
 			p = &parent->rb_left;
 		else if (cred > sp->so_cred)
@@ -190,6 +199,14 @@ nfs4_insert_state_owner(struct nfs_client *clp, struct nfs4_state_owner *new)
 		parent = *p;
 		sp = rb_entry(parent, struct nfs4_state_owner, so_client_node);
 
+		if (new->so_server < sp->so_server) {
+			p = &parent->rb_left;
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (new->so_server > sp->so_server) {
+			p = &parent->rb_right;
+			continue;
+		}
 		if (new->so_cred < sp->so_cred)
 			p = &parent->rb_left;
 		else if (new->so_cred > sp->so_cred)
@@ -260,7 +277,7 @@ struct nfs4_state_owner *nfs4_get_state_owner(struct nfs_server *server, struct
 	struct nfs4_state_owner *sp, *new;
 
 	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
-	sp = nfs4_find_state_owner(clp, cred);
+	sp = nfs4_find_state_owner(server, cred);
 	spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
 	if (sp != NULL)
 		return sp;
@@ -268,6 +285,7 @@ struct nfs4_state_owner *nfs4_get_state_owner(struct nfs_server *server, struct
 	if (new == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 	new->so_client = clp;
+	new->so_server = server;
 	new->so_cred = cred;
 	spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
 	sp = nfs4_insert_state_owner(clp, new);