[Labeled-nfs] Interface for DOI mapping
Paul Moore
paul.moore at hp.com
Tue Dec 4 13:49:39 EST 2007
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 12:10:15 pm Casey Schaufler wrote:
> which brings up the question of who does the translation.
> I suggest that the receiver always do the mapping and that the
> sender always speaks it's native DOI.
You've got more experience in this area than I do, but I would think that
offering translations about on the sender and receiver would be necessary to
handle both new hosts (systems that support multiple DOIs through
translation) as well as legacy hosts (systems that only support a single
DOI). In the case of a receiver that supports DOI translation, I agree, it
probably is best for the sender to send data using it's default/native DOI
and let the receiver translate as necessary. However, if the receiver does
not understand multiple DOIs it will be necessary for the sender to ensure
that data sent to the receiver it sent with the receiver's DOI; requiring the
use of sender side DOI translation in certain cases.
In either case, I think a properly designed and configured system would only
want to perform the translation once. Although there shouldn't be anything
preventing someone for configuring the translation to happen on both ends if
that is what they really want.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
More information about the Labeled-nfs
mailing list