problems configuring util-linux-2.12
Kevin Coffman
kwc at citi.umich.edu
Sun Oct 29 16:32:50 EST 2006
On 10/29/06, J. Bruce Fields <bfields at fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 01:32:48AM -0600, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> > After downloading and unpacking source for util-linux-2.12 I applied the
> > CITI NFS4 patches per the instructions then ran configure and recieved
> > the following complaints;
> > configuring util-linux-2.12
>
> Recent nfs-utils now include their own mount program. Is there any
> reason for us to continue recommending that people patch util-linux, or
> should we remove that and update our documentation?
The mount in nfs-utils is disabled by default. I don't recall the
exact reason offhand.
More information about the NFSv4
mailing list