[RFC,PATCH 0/4] Dynamic Pseudo Root

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:10:49AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
> > If we need to ensure there is only one mountd (which sounds like a
> > good idea anyway), it is hardly difficult to achieve that (lock files
> > etc).
> Either avoid it starting multiple mountds or embrace it. Meaning, 
> maybe it make senses make mountd multiple threaded?? 

It already has a --num-threads option, actually.  (They're actually
processes created with fork(), but whatever.)

--b.