[RFC,PATCH 0/4] Dynamic Pseudo Root

[Steve Dickson]

J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:10:49AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Neil Brown wrote:
>>> If we need to ensure there is only one mountd (which sounds like a
>>> good idea anyway), it is hardly difficult to achieve that (lock files
>>> etc).
>> Either avoid it starting multiple mountds or embrace it. Meaning, 
>> maybe it make senses make mountd multiple threaded?? 
> 
> It already has a --num-threads option, actually.  (They're actually
> processes created with fork(), but whatever.)
I see that... alot of forking with no locking... hmm....

steved.