[PATCH] NLM: hold BKL when clearing global lockd task and serv vars
J. Bruce Fields
bfields at fieldses.org
Mon Apr 7 16:50:27 EDT 2008
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:22:41PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:56:15 -0400
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields at fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:45:01PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 09:38:34AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > The global task and serv pointers for lockd are normally protected by
> > > > the nlmsvc_mutex. The exception is when the lockd exits abnormally. When
> > > > this occurs, these variables are cleared without any locking.
> > >
> > > Shouldn't we get rid of the case where it exits abnormally instead?
> >
> > I tried to figure out when this could actually occur (when can
> > svc_recv() return an error other than -EINTR or -EAGAIN?), and got lost
> > in sock_recvmsg():
> >
> > - svc_recv() itself returns only -EAGAIN or the return from
> > ->xpo_recvfrom().
> > - the only xpo_recvfrom() that's interesting is
> > svc_tcp_recvfrom(), which can return the error it gets from
> > svc_recvfrom(), which can return the error from
> > kernel_recvmsg(), which gets its return from sock_recvmsg().
> >
> > Since __sock_recvmsg() has a security hook, it looks like we can end up
> > with an -EACCES from selinux?
> >
> > So one case would be selinux deciding we weren't allowed to receive
> > packets from this socket. Huh.
>
> I got lost there too, but I would suspect that there are other errors
> that can bubble up from the lower networking layers as well. Even if
> there aren't currently, it's probably still prudent to assume that it's
> a possibility and code for it.
>
> I tend to think the safest thing is probably to do a long sleep (1s or
> so and retry when we get an error (maybe also a ratelimited printk?).
Yeah, I guess I can't think of anything better.
--b.
> It's unlikely to do any harm (other than a few wasted CPU cycles), and
> if the error is transient then we have the possibility to recover and
> continue normal operation.
More information about the NFSv4
mailing list