OP LOCK4: question about open_to_lock_owner4:lock_seqid

[DENIEL Philippe]

Rick Macklem a écrit :
> I found this in the ietf archive:
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg01253.html
>
> It is specifically discussing the recovery case, but the basic problem is
> that the RFC doesn't tell you if the lock_seqid in the open_to_lock_owner4
> case should be incremented when the Lock Op fails, due to an error.
>
> As such, some clients might increment it and I believe a server might want to
> accept the retry with a non-zero lock_seqid?
>
> rick
>   
This in pretty interesting :-)  many thanks for the help (and URL ;-) ).

    Philippe