NFSv4-patched ACL lib dependencies

[Steve Dickson]

Paarvai Naai wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> I see your point.  When installing to /usr/local/lib it will be
> difficult to have an analogous separation as one would in /lib and
> /usr/lib.  I guess someone from Redhat (Steve?) might have a better
> idea on the philosophy they take for Fedora and how they manage these
> sorts of issues when packaging for RPM distribution (e.g., for
> samba-common).
The general philosophy is just don't break anything... 8-)
I don't think there are any particular guidelines as to what
can or can not go into /lib... I took a quick look and didn't
find anything... 

Looking at the /lib/*.so in Fedora 9 there is only one out
of the 38 .so that have dependency on /usr/lib... so its
pretty clean.. 

> 
> Also, is the plan to update the libacl patch to dynamically load
> libnfsidmap.so at run-time or will the patch for libacl continue
> enforce compile-time linking to libnfsidmap?
I would think that former would be better than the latter...

steved.