Last call for nfs-utils patches

Timo Aaltonen tjaalton at cc.hut.fi
Sat Mar 8 13:07:38 EST 2008


On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Steve Dickson wrote:

>
> I'm planning on cutting a nfs-utils-1.1.2 release since
> there has been a number commits since the last 1.1.1 release.
>
> The attached list are all of the commits that have been made to
> the git://linux-nfs.org/nfs-utils git tree.
>
> (Note: to get a working copy of this tree use:
>    git clone  git://linux-nfs.org/nfs-utils nfs-utils)
>
> So if you don't see a commit you have posted to either
> the nfs or nfsv4 mailing list it probably means I missed it
> so you might want to bring it to my attention.
> (Please Note, the patch authors in some of my earlier
> commit are incorrect. This was simply due to my lack
> of git knowledge. Once it was pointed it out to me,
> the problem was corrected.)
>
> Also if you were holding off posting some (hopefully)
> non-intrusive patches now it the time. There is a very
> good chance I will not cut the release until this weekend.

Here's another patch (by Niall Sheridan) that needs approval:

- - -

rpc.gssd FD_ALLOC_BLOCK too low

The max number of sec=krb5 mounts that rpc.gssd will handle is hardcoded 
at 32. From utils/gssd/gssd.h:
#define FD_ALLOC_BLOCK 32

This causes problems and errors like:
  RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out.
when the number of kerberized nfs mounts approaches the hard limit.

Since linux supports a maximum of 256 nfs mounts, perhaps this number can 
be upped to 200 or so.

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11961434/nfs-utils-fd-alloc-block.debdiff

- - -

what say you?

t


More information about the NFSv4 mailing list