[RFC]Introduce generalized hooks for getting and setting inode secctx v3

[James Morris]

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Casey Schaufler wrote:

> Oh, cut the crap. What part of my explainations don't you understand?
> 
> I understand the functionality. That is not my point. My point is
> that inode_notifysecctx() explicitly prohibits the LSM from providing
> integrity of the security attributes by introducing a differentiation
> between the "in-core" and "on-disk" values, and making it explicit
> that the one is set, but not the other.
> 
> Clearly this is the direction you intend to go. Have fun with it.
> I've raised the issue, y'all aren't seeing it. Maybe I'm wrong,
> it has happened before.

Please stop trolling.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>