Performance degradation measurement [was Re: [PATCH 06/37] Security: Separate task security context from task_struct [ver #34]]

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:12:08 -0000, David Howells said:

(Sorry - finally catching up)

>  (1) SELinux enabled, none of the security patches:
> 
> 	(gdb) p (1.119+1.110+1.104+1.106+1.095+1.112+1.094+1.091+1.112)/9
> 	$3 = 1.104777777777777

>  (4) LSM/SELinux disabled, none of the security patches:
> 
> 	(gdb) p (1.121+1.136+1.137+1.121+1.122+1.131+1.121+1.131+1.118)/9
> 	$7 = 1.1264444444444437

What's up with *that*?  The *fastest* run with it disabled is 1.118, and
the *slowest* with it enabled is 1.119.  At that point, I have to wonder
what we're really measuring here....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/attachments/20080323/4b770def/attachment.pgp