[pnfs] Rahul's patches

[Marc Eshel]

You build it from the current master branch and you don't have patches 
that are not merged yet right ? 
how did you run it:
did your client load the nfslayoutdriver ?
which file system did you use on the server ?
did you have any DSs ?
how did you run Connectathon (which runs / options)
anything else that I should now about your test ?

I just want to try to do the same to make sure we are comparing the same 
test.

Thanks, Narc.
 






"William A. (Andy) Adamson" <andros at citi.umich.edu> 
Sent by: androsadamson at gmail.com
04/20/2007 09:04 AM

To
"Marc Eshel" <eshel at almaden.ibm.com>
cc
"Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com>, pnfs at linux-nfs.org
Subject
Re: [pnfs] Rahul's patches








On 4/19/07, Marc Eshel <eshel at almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
I just tried to run Connectathon on the master branch and it failed. I did
not even load the nfslayoutdriver, I did not have any DSs just an MDS.


i just ran the connectathon tests on the master branch and i succeeded. 

-->Andy

the command was:
        runtests -a -t

the output: 

.....

./test9: statfs
        1500 statfs calls in 0.29 seconds
        ./test9 ok.

Congratulations, you passed the basic tests!

GENERAL TESTS: directory /mnt/test
if test ! -x runtests; then chmod a+x runtests; fi 
cd /mnt/test; rm -f Makefile runtests runtests.wrk *.sh *.c mkdummy
rmdummy nroff.in makefile.tst
cp Makefile runtests runtests.wrk *.sh *.c mkdummy rmdummy nroff.in
makefile.tst /mnt/test

Small Compile
./stat: no data in smcomp.time
general tests failed




"Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com >
04/19/2007 01:56 PM

To
"Marc Eshel" <eshel at almaden.ibm.com>, "William A. \(Andy\) Adamson"
< andros at citi.umich.edu>
cc
<pnfs at linux-nfs.org>
Subject
RE: [pnfs] Rahul's patches






Hi Marc,
I haven't tested it extensively, just a couple of Connectathon runs, and 
I haven't seen it yet.
Thanks
Rahul


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Eshel [mailto:eshel at almaden.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 12:46 PM 
> To: William A. (Andy) Adamson
> Cc: pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> Subject: Re: [pnfs] Rahul's patches
>
> Was the 4.1-sessions branch tested for read write to make 
> sure we don't have a problem with the sessions code ?
> Marc.
>
> pnfs-bounces at linux-nfs.org wrote on 04/19/2007 11:02:27 AM:
>
> > Hi everyone 
> >
> > I have added Rahul's patches to the 4.1-sessions branch,
> and will not
> > merge the changes with the master until we fix the bug that Marc
> found.
> >
> > -->Andy_______________________________________________ 
> > pNFS mailing list
> > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs 
> _______________________________________________
> pNFS mailing list
> pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
>