[pnfs] Rahul's patches

[William A. (Andy) Adamson]

On 4/20/07, Marc Eshel <eshel at almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> You build it from the current master branch and you don't have patches
> that are not merged yet right ?
> how did you run it:
> did your client load the nfslayoutdriver ?
> which file system did you use on the server ?
> did you have any DSs ?
> how did you run Connectathon (which runs / options)
> anything else that I should now about your test ?
>
> I just want to try to do the same to make sure we are comparing the same
> test.



yes - i did the following on ibmcl1 and manchester

ibmcl1% git fetch origin   to make sure the origin/master is up to date
(there should be no change)
and then

ibmcl1% git log origin/master...my-master

had no output, indicating that the 'my-master' branch is in sync with the
origin/master.

-->Andy

Thanks, Narc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "William A. (Andy) Adamson" <andros at citi.umich.edu>
> Sent by: androsadamson at gmail.com
> 04/20/2007 09:04 AM
>
> To
> "Marc Eshel" <eshel at almaden.ibm.com>
> cc
> "Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com>, pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> Subject
> Re: [pnfs] Rahul's patches
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/19/07, Marc Eshel <eshel at almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
> I just tried to run Connectathon on the master branch and it failed. I did
> not even load the nfslayoutdriver, I did not have any DSs just an MDS.
>
>
> i just ran the connectathon tests on the master branch and i succeeded.
>
> -->Andy
>
> the command was:
>         runtests -a -t
>
> the output:
>
> .....
>
> ./test9: statfs
>         1500 statfs calls in 0.29 seconds
>         ./test9 ok.
>
> Congratulations, you passed the basic tests!
>
> GENERAL TESTS: directory /mnt/test
> if test ! -x runtests; then chmod a+x runtests; fi
> cd /mnt/test; rm -f Makefile runtests runtests.wrk *.sh *.c mkdummy
> rmdummy nroff.in makefile.tst
> cp Makefile runtests runtests.wrk *.sh *.c mkdummy rmdummy nroff.in
> makefile.tst /mnt/test
>
> Small Compile
> ./stat: no data in smcomp.time
> general tests failed
>
>
>
>
> "Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com >
> 04/19/2007 01:56 PM
>
> To
> "Marc Eshel" <eshel at almaden.ibm.com>, "William A. \(Andy\) Adamson"
> < andros at citi.umich.edu>
> cc
> <pnfs at linux-nfs.org>
> Subject
> RE: [pnfs] Rahul's patches
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Marc,
> I haven't tested it extensively, just a couple of Connectathon runs, and
> I haven't seen it yet.
> Thanks
> Rahul
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Eshel [mailto:eshel at almaden.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 12:46 PM
> > To: William A. (Andy) Adamson
> > Cc: pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> > Subject: Re: [pnfs] Rahul's patches
> >
> > Was the 4.1-sessions branch tested for read write to make
> > sure we don't have a problem with the sessions code ?
> > Marc.
> >
> > pnfs-bounces at linux-nfs.org wrote on 04/19/2007 11:02:27 AM:
> >
> > > Hi everyone
> > >
> > > I have added Rahul's patches to the 4.1-sessions branch,
> > and will not
> > > merge the changes with the master until we fix the bug that Marc
> > found.
> > >
> > > -->Andy_______________________________________________
> > > pNFS mailing list
> > > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> > _______________________________________________
> > pNFS mailing list
> > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> >
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/pnfs/attachments/20070420/f4575c94/attachment-0001.htm