[pnfs] Rahul's patches

[Marc Eshel]

After fixing a problem with the Connectathon test (it was compiling a 
program and getting unexpected warnings) and doing a 'git fetch origin' I 
was able to run the Connectathon test against an MDS with two DSs. I also 
tried to reproduce the old problem that I saw by writing some big files 
but I was not able to. 
Marc.

androsadamson at gmail.com wrote on 04/20/2007 09:27:30 AM:

> 

> On 4/20/07, Marc Eshel <eshel at almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
> You build it from the current master branch and you don't have patches
> that are not merged yet right ?
> how did you run it:
> did your client load the nfslayoutdriver ?
> which file system did you use on the server ? 
> did you have any DSs ?
> how did you run Connectathon (which runs / options)
> anything else that I should now about your test ?
> 
> I just want to try to do the same to make sure we are comparing the same
> test. 
> 
> 
> yes - i did the following on ibmcl1 and manchester
> 
> ibmcl1% git fetch origin   to make sure the origin/master is up to 
> date (there should be no change)
> and then
> 
> ibmcl1% git log origin/master...my-master 
> 
> had no output, indicating that the 'my-master' branch is in sync 
> with the origin/master.
> 
> -->Andy
> 
> Thanks, Narc.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "William A. (Andy) Adamson" <andros at citi.umich.edu>
> Sent by: androsadamson at gmail.com 
> 04/20/2007 09:04 AM
> 
> To
> "Marc Eshel" <eshel at almaden.ibm.com>
> cc
> "Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com >, pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> Subject
> Re: [pnfs] Rahul's patches
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/19/07, Marc Eshel <eshel at almaden.ibm.com > wrote:
> I just tried to run Connectathon on the master branch and it failed. I 
did
> not even load the nfslayoutdriver, I did not have any DSs just an MDS.
> 
> 
> i just ran the connectathon tests on the master branch and i succeeded. 
> 
> -->Andy
> 
> the command was:
>         runtests -a -t
> 
> the output:
> 
> .....
> 
> ./test9: statfs
>         1500 statfs calls in 0.29 seconds
>         ./test9 ok.
> 
> Congratulations, you passed the basic tests! 
> 
> GENERAL TESTS: directory /mnt/test
> if test ! -x runtests; then chmod a+x runtests; fi
> cd /mnt/test; rm -f Makefile runtests runtests.wrk *.sh *.c mkdummy
> rmdummy nroff.in makefile.tst 
> cp Makefile runtests runtests.wrk *.sh *.c mkdummy rmdummy nroff.in
> makefile.tst /mnt/test
> 
> Small Compile
> ./stat: no data in smcomp.time
> general tests failed
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com >
> 04/19/2007 01:56 PM
> 
> To
> "Marc Eshel" <eshel at almaden.ibm.com >, "William A. \(Andy\) Adamson"
> < andros at citi.umich.edu>
> cc
> <pnfs at linux-nfs.org>
> Subject
> RE: [pnfs] Rahul's patches 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Marc,
> I haven't tested it extensively, just a couple of Connectathon runs, and
> I haven't seen it yet.
> Thanks
> Rahul
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Eshel [mailto: eshel at almaden.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 12:46 PM
> > To: William A. (Andy) Adamson
> > Cc: pnfs at linux-nfs.org 
> > Subject: Re: [pnfs] Rahul's patches
> >
> > Was the 4.1-sessions branch tested for read write to make
> > sure we don't have a problem with the sessions code ?
> > Marc.
> >
> > pnfs-bounces at linux-nfs.org wrote on 04/19/2007 11:02:27 AM:
> >
> > > Hi everyone
> > >
> > > I have added Rahul's patches to the 4.1-sessions branch,
> > and will not
> > > merge the changes with the master until we fix the bug that Marc 
> > found.
> > >
> > > -->Andy_______________________________________________
> > > pNFS mailing list
> > > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> > _______________________________________________
> > pNFS mailing list
> > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> >
> 
> 
>