[pnfs] OP_SEQUENCE for ethereal
Garth Goodson
Garth.Goodson at netapp.com
Mon Feb 26 13:16:54 EST 2007
I'm fine with someone hosting a git tree of wireshark sources.
One problem with submitting them is that they really aren't as clean as
they should be. For example, I typically ignore when things should be
broken into subtrees (e.g., when you click on the little triangle thingy
to further open a structure in the ethereal gui). I also don't know the
process for submission into wireshark.
-Garth
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:59:36AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Can we maintain an up-to-date git tree of the wireshark sources
>> until the nfsv4 rfc is submitted (and then submit what we have
>> to wireshark-dev)?
>
> Weren't there some small changes made to the NFSv4.0 .x after ethereal
> got NFSv4.0 support? I seem to recall that it did cause some confusion,
> but that on balance it was worth it.... But I was just starting on NFS
> at the time, so somebody else may remember better.
>
> But anyway, it might be worth it just to go ahead and submit the
> wireshark code even if it's a little wrong.
>
> --b.
More information about the pNFS
mailing list