[pnfs] pNFS and sessions testing at connectathon
Lisa Week
Lisa.Week at Sun.COM
Fri Jan 26 17:31:35 EST 2007
Hi Rahul,
(Note: I have Cc'd nfsv41-discuss at opensolaris.org in order to include
the others working on the Solaris implementation.)
Iyer, Rahul wrote:
> Hi Lisa,
> I had a few questions about your implementation for connectathon.
>
> 1. Will you hae a complete sessions implementation? Our implementation
> of sessions is incomplete in that we do not do proper sequence number
> accounting and/or flow control. So, it would be nice if you could turn
> off sequence # checking on your server.
Yes, the sessions implementation is pretty complete. No matter what, I
think we will be able to turn off the sequence id checking on the server
if needed.
>
> 2. Would you be dealing with the case of multiple sessions created to
> the data server?
I think I am a little confused by this. Do you mean multiple sessions
created by the same client? Or multiple clients creating a session?
If it is either of those, we have a little work to do prior to Cthon,
but should be able to handle this.
>
> 3. What days do you plan to be at connectathon? I have to attend a
> Netapp meeting on the 6th (Tuesday) so I won't be at Connectathon. I
> should be able to attend all other days. hat days do you think are
> convenient for you?
We plan to be there from the beginning (Thursday, 2/1) to the end
(Thursday, 2/9). How about we start up testing as soon as possible, say
Thursday, 2/1?
Thanks,
Lisa
More information about the pNFS
mailing list