[pnfs] NFS4ERR_BADSESSION in connectathon testing

Labiaga, Ricardo Ricardo.Labiaga at netapp.com
Tue Jul 3 12:56:33 EDT 2007


Hi Andy,
 
I did not run the locking tests in Austin.  The Solaris client ran the
basic and general tests against our server and ran into problems in the
special tests.  We ran out of time to debug it though.
 
- ricardo


________________________________

	From: William A. (Andy) Adamson [mailto:andros at citi.umich.edu] 
	Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:34 AM
	To: pnfs at linux-nfs.org
	Subject: [pnfs] NFS4ERR_BADSESSION in connectathon testing
	
	
	Hi
	
	I'm testing my Austin final patch set, which includes setting
the clientid in the LOCK/LOCKT and LOCKU operations to zero. The tests
pass - sometimes! When they fail, it is usually in the connectathon lock
tests, after I've run either the basic or special tests. The lock tests
have (so far) always run successfully when run first. The lock tests
always fail on test #12, the 2nd time through test series. 
	
	The error is on the client which sends two compounds on the wire
with the same session sequence number and slot number which causes the
server to correctly return NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, and the client hangs.
	
	Connectathon lock test #12 involves a child and parent one holds
the lock, the other waiting, and is then signaled. So there is a timing
piece to the test. 
	
	Has anybody else seen this behaviour? I don't think it is due to
the LOCK patches, and I don't think anyone else ran the Connectathon
lock tests in Austin - is that right?
	
	-->Andy
	
	
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/pnfs/attachments/20070703/649f32d2/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the pNFS mailing list