[pnfs] [PATCH] update exchange id reply to draft 9

William A. (Andy) Adamson andros at citi.umich.edu
Thu Mar 8 12:17:12 EST 2007


On 3/8/07, J. Bruce Fields <bfields at fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:21:09AM -0800, Marc Eshel wrote:
> > OK, if we all agree that we want to completely ignore implementation id
> > that I will redo the patch. Bruc, READ_BUF doesn't move p forward maybe
> > there some other macro to do it but for now I will use "p +=
> > XDR_QUADLEN(len)".
>
> OK.  The assignment at the top of READ_BUF may all you need if don't
> need p updated until the next READ_BUF.
>
>         #define READ_BUF(nbytes)  do { \
>                 p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, nbytes); \
>
> > I see that much of the new code was not tabs and I
> > change only new line, should we add tabs any time we see it missing even
> > for unrelated fix ?
>
> Some time we'll have to go back through the older 4.1 work and fix that
> too, but for now I think for now each new patch should change whitespace
> on lines that the patch is already touching.



i have done this when i separated the sessions code from the pNFS code. I'm
testing the sessions only git branch now - i can mount, and i'm chasing a
bug or two.

then i will create a git branch off the sessions-only branch, and review/fix
all the pNFS code, including tabs/white space.

-->Andy

--b.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/pnfs/attachments/20070308/5705e4ee/attachment.htm 


More information about the pNFS mailing list