[pnfs] [PATCH] Removed sessions hard-coded 32678 byte max sizes

[Marc Eshel]

If we have a plan that can show that we can do all those changes with a 
new kernel and be ready for bakeathon than I would support it. I don't 
want to go to the bakeathon unprepared, in the last connectathon we did 
not accomplish much (with the pNFS testing) because we were not ready. We 
can do it with the risk that we will not make the bakeathon which is fine 
with me, but I will not go to Austin with an unstable system.
Marc. 

"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields at fieldses.org> wrote on 03/16/2007 01:36:29 PM:

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:49:25AM -0700, Marc Eshel wrote:
> > I think that the priority should be show a complete implementation for 
the 
> > bakeathon so the draft can verify that the draft is complete and than 
go 
> > back and reorganize the code for future development on latest kernels.
> 
> The diff from mainline right now is about 14,000 lines changed across 74
> files.  In another 3 months that'll be much larger.  Is it going to be
> practical to reorgnize that?
> 
> Would there be any chance of getting a minimal mainline-ready
> implementation of sessions ready by the bakeathon?  (I don't know what
> the minimum useful functionality would be--would enough to support
> delegation recalls over NATs be too much?)
> 
> --b.