[pnfs] future pNFS Status meeting

[Muntz, Daniel]

FWIW, Monday at 10AM rules out Ricardo, Mike and myself.

  -Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iyer, Rahul 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:55 AM
> To: Marc Eshel
> Cc: pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> Subject: Re: [pnfs] future pNFS Status meeting
> 
> Hi Guys,
> My meeting is hour long, from 9:30 to 10:30. So how about 
> Monday at 10 AM?
> Thanks
> Regards
> Rahul 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Eshel [mailto:eshel at almaden.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 7:58 AM
> > To: Iyer, Rahul
> > Cc: Benny Halevy; pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> > Subject: RE: [pnfs] future pNFS Status meeting
> > 
> > Will 10am PT work for you both? If not than we should 
> switch the day. 
> > 
> > "Iyer, Rahul" <Rahul.Iyer at netapp.com> wrote on 05/09/2007 
> 03:20:53 AM:
> > 
> > > No, it's at 9:30 AM PT. Mondays and Thursdays work for me too!
> > > Regards
> > > Rahul
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Benny Halevy [mailto:bhalevy at panasas.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:19 AM
> > > > To: Marc Eshel
> > > > Cc: Iyer, Rahul; pnfs at linux-nfs.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [pnfs] future pNFS Status meeting
> > > > 
> > > > Marc Eshel wrote:
> > > > > If there is no opposition the pNFS statues meetings
> > will start at
> > > > > 10:30am PT, starting next week, this week there is no
> > meeting. The
> > > > > cluster-coherent NFS meeting will probably move to 10am PT.
> > > > 
> > > > Isn't it already at 10am?
> > > > I'll be happier if we can just swap the two rather than
> > pushing the
> > > > pnfs meeting one hour ahead as it's pretty late for me
> > (10:30 am PT
> > > > == 8:30 pm IT).  If we consider another day at the same 
> hour then 
> > > > Mondays or Thursdays work for me.
> > > > 
> > > > > Marc.
> > > > > 
> > > > > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields at fieldses.org> wrote on
> > > > 05/08/2007 03:19:48 PM:
> > > > > 
> > > > >> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:16:43PM -0700, Iyer, Rahul wrote:
> > > > >>> Unfortunately, a company meeting seems to conflict
> > with the pNFS
> > > > > meeing
> > > > >>> starting this week. Would it be possible to move the pNFS 
> > > > >>> meeting
> > > > > after
> > > > >>> the cluster meeting (at 10:30 AM)? Or maybe another
> > day with the
> > > > > current
> > > > >>> timing?
> > > > >> I'm happy to learn I'm not the only one who's confused
> > > > when the main
> > > > >> point of a message is put in the subject line....
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --b.
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > pNFS mailing list
> > > > > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > > > > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Benny Halevy
> > > > Panasas Inc.
> > > > Accelerating Time to Results(TM) with Clustered Storage
> > > > 
> > > > www.panasas.com
> > > > bhalevy at panasas.com
> > > > Tel/Fax: +972-3-647-8340
> > > > Mobile: +972-54-802-8340
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > pNFS mailing list
> > > > pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> > > > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> > > > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> pNFS mailing list
> pNFS at linux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
>