[pnfs] pnfs 2.6.18 bakeathon patches

[William A. (Andy) Adamson]

Any other opinions concerning which bakeathon patches should be pushed to
the 2.6.18.3 git tree?

-->Andy

On 10/16/07, Marc Eshel <eshel at almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I would prefer that only performance patches (and allow retry rpc) and to
> not include any protocol changes since I have many machines out there
> working with the current code. Here is the list of fixes I would like to
> include
>         more slots
>         Dean's read fix
>         use hostname not IP addr for exchange id
>         allow repeat RPC
> Marc.
>
> androsadamson at gmail.com wrote on 10/16/2007 09:02:14 AM:
>
> > Hi Dean
> >
> > I don't know about your directory, but I do have the patch applied
> > on ibmcl1:/usr/local/src/kernel/pnfs-git along with the rest of the
> > bakeathon patches. Should I push the patches? Marc was concerned
> > about the effect on performance from the draft-13 device and layout
> updates.
> >
> > -->Andy
>
> > On 10/15/07, dean hildebrand <seattleplus at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > I just looked in this directory and I'm not sure why, but this patch
> > no longer exists.  I just placed it back in the directory as stated
> > below.  Things seem to mysteriously disappear out of this directory
> > sometimes....
> >
> > Dean
> >
> > On 10/12/07, dean hildebrand <seattleplus at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Andy,
> > >
> > > Here is the exchangeid fix patch for 2.6.18 git:
> > > troy:/home/dhildebz//bakeathon_patches_2.6.18/0004-ipaddr-
> > sessionid-fix.patch
> > >
> > > Dean
> > >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/pnfs/attachments/20071016/ad1bc78c/attachment.htm