[pnfs] [PATCH 17/38] [v1] pnfs: require layout driver {alloc, free}_layout
Dean Hildebrand
seattleplus at gmail.com
Mon Jan 7 17:09:56 EST 2008
Should we also require set_layout?
Dean
Benny Halevy wrote:
> mandate implementation of the layout driver's
> alloc_layout and free_layout methods
>
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy at panasas.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index d4500e0..cfd20d1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -258,12 +258,19 @@ struct pnfs_client_operations*
> pnfs_register_layoutdriver(struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld_type)
> {
> struct pnfs_module *pnfs_mod;
> + struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops = ld_type->ld_io_ops;
>
> if (!pnfs_initialized) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s Registration failure. pNFS not initialized.\n", __FUNCTION__);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + if (!io_ops || !io_ops->alloc_layout || !io_ops->free_layout) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s Layout driver must provide "
> + "alloc_layout and free_layout.\n", __FUNCTION__);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> pnfs_mod = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pnfs_module), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (pnfs_mod != NULL) {
> dprintk("%s Registering id:%u name:%s\n",
>
More information about the pNFS
mailing list