[pnfs] [PATCH 0/32] block layout patches

[Fredric Isaman]

On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Dean Hildebrand wrote:

> It seems to me that there are 3 conversations in this patchset.  Is there any 
> way you could re-organize these patches in 3 patchsets?  nfs/pnfs/pnfsblock. 
> The reason I ask is that I like some of the nfs/pnfs changes, and would be 
> willing to put some into the nfs41/pnfs tree, but they are hard to review 
> when intermingled with the pnfsblock patches.  If you want, you could put the 
> reason for the nfs/pnfs changes in the patch header (e.g., block needs this 
> to xxxxxx)
>
> Dean
>

I tried to distinguish them via the prefix of the subject line, so that 
you could ignore anything that starts with "pnfsblock:" if you wanted to 
only look at pnfs changes.  However, I admit they are ordered more for my 
convienence than a reviewers.  Would it suffice to reorder them such that 
all nfs, then pnfs, then pnfsblock were in succession?

 	Fred

> Fred Isaman wrote:
>> These patches implement block layout (draft 5), and incorporate Benny's
>> comments from the last round.
>> 
>> The panlayout error case is broken by patch 5, but is restored via
>> patch 6 and a separate panlayout patch to follow.  If there is some
>> better way to handle this let me know.
>>
>>      Fred
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pNFS mailing list
>> pNFS at linux-nfs.org
>> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
>>