[pnfs] what happened to pnfs4_proc_write_setup?
Benny Halevy
bhalevy at panasas.com
Mon May 5 18:30:41 EDT 2008
Dean Hildebrand wrote:
> thanks Benny,
>
> btw, does anyone else find the checking out branches is very slow?
I found that the larger the delta is (in number of patches or files git
has to apply)
the longer it takes. If you checkout "close" relatives like nfs41 and
pnfs it's
runs faster for me.
Benny
>
> Dean
>
> Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Dean Hildebrand wrote:
>>> From looking on git-web, it was in 2.6.24, so it must be a merge
>>> problem.
>>>
>> True, it erroneously went away with the rebase to 2.6.25.
>> I'll submit a patch to bring it back.
>>> Does anyone know how I can get a copy of the 2.6.24 tree prior to
>>> benny's move to 2.6.25? I think we are going to need it a lot for
>>> the BAT.......
>>>
>>
>> The refs are still available as tags named *-2.6.24-2008-03-27
>> I recreated the branches pointing to them for ease of browsing.
>>
>> Benny
>>
>>> Dean
>>>
>>> Dean Hildebrand wrote:
>>>
>>>> What happened to this function? It no longer exists, and therefore
>>>> the special pnfs write compound (which does not include a getattr)
>>>> is no longer being called.....
>>>>
>>>> Dean
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pNFS mailing list
>>> pNFS at linux-nfs.org
>>> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
>>>
>>
More information about the pNFS
mailing list