[pnfs] [PATCH 1/5] pnfs: Several non-critical fixups.
Dean Hildebrand
seattleplus at gmail.com
Wed May 7 18:13:22 EDT 2008
Benny Halevy wrote:
> On May. 06, 2008, 16:45 -0700, Dean Hildebrand <seattleplus at gmail.com> wrote:
> <snip>
>
>
>> @@ -499,10 +499,11 @@ decode_and_add_ds(uint32_t **pp, struct filelayout_mount_type *mt)
>> */
>> if (!ds->ds_clp) {
>> err = nfs4_pnfs_ds_create(mds_srv, ds);
>> - printk(KERN_ERR
>> - "%s nfs4_pnfs_ds_create returned %d\n", __func__, err);
>> - if (err)
>> + if (err) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s nfs4_pnfs_ds_create error %d\n",
>> + __func__, err);
>> goto out_err;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>
> Why is this non-critical?
> This looks like a real bug fix to me....
>
well, it is an erroneous printk, so treat it as you want...
>
>
>> @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ pnfs_update_layout_commit(struct inode *inode,
>> struct nfs_page *nfs_page = nfs_list_entry(head->next);
>> int status;
>>
>> - dprintk("--> %s inode %p layout range: %Zd@%Lu\n", __func__, inode,
>> + dprintk("--> %s inode %p layout range: %Zd@%Zu\n", __func__, inode,
>> (size_t)(npages * PAGE_SIZE),
>> (loff_t)idx_start * PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>>
>
>
> Why is that?
> Do you get a warning in your environment?
> How about this instead?
>
> dprintk("--> %s inode %p layout range: %Zd@%Lu\n", __func__, inode,
> (size_t)(npages * PAGE_SIZE),
> - (loff_t)idx_start * PAGE_SIZE);
> + (u64)idx_start * PAGE_SIZE);
>
I don't get any warnings on 64 bit, but good catch. There is a problem,
but I think the main culprit is the parenthesis. pgoff_t is unsigned
long, so casting it to loff_t is actually wrong, and so is u64 it
seems. So I think the real format is %lu. There is also a indentation
error.
Let me send a new patch.
Dean
More information about the pNFS
mailing list