Test matrix
From Linux NFS
(Difference between revisions)
(→Category) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''[[Matrix_functional_section|Functional]]''' Ability to do what it's supposed to do. Standards compliance, regression, compatibility, static code analysis, etc. | *'''[[Matrix_functional_section|Functional]]''' Ability to do what it's supposed to do. Standards compliance, regression, compatibility, static code analysis, etc. | ||
| - | *'''[[Matrix_interop_section| | + | *'''[[Matrix_interop_section|Interoperability]]''' Ability to work with other versions of nfs, other operating systems and other software/filesystems/etc. generally associated with NFS |
*'''[[Matrix_robustness_section|Robustness]]''' : Remains stable and recovers even in extreme situations, Stability, interoperability, error recovery, race conditions, etc | *'''[[Matrix_robustness_section|Robustness]]''' : Remains stable and recovers even in extreme situations, Stability, interoperability, error recovery, race conditions, etc | ||
*'''[[Matrix_performance_section|Performance]]''' : Able to perform well under real and theoretical workloads Load, stress, destruction, scalability, etc | *'''[[Matrix_performance_section|Performance]]''' : Able to perform well under real and theoretical workloads Load, stress, destruction, scalability, etc | ||
Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2005
Version 1.12
This pages summarizes testing efforts for NFSv4, and identify testing gaps. Email nfsv4@linux-nfs.org with feedback or to take ownership of a task. If you are doing NFSv4 testing, please let us know! The matrix is divided into five categories, each on its own page in this page.
Contents |
Category
- Functional Ability to do what it's supposed to do. Standards compliance, regression, compatibility, static code analysis, etc.
- Interoperability Ability to work with other versions of nfs, other operating systems and other software/filesystems/etc. generally associated with NFS
- Robustness : Remains stable and recovers even in extreme situations, Stability, interoperability, error recovery, race conditions, etc
- Performance : Able to perform well under real and theoretical workloads Load, stress, destruction, scalability, etc
- security : Resistant to being compromised and difficult to attack
Status Summary
Definitions
- New : An owner has not been identified for the item and work has not started on it
- Open: The task has been adopted, but either has not been started, or progress is not yet known
- In Progress : Some work has been completed on the task
- Near Done: The principle essense of the task has been finished, but there are some loose ends left
- Done: The task has been fully completed
Functional Testing
| New | Open | In progress | Near Done | Done | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current status | 104 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 72 | 22 |
Interoperability Testing
| New | Open | In progress | Near Done | Done | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current status | 55 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 12 | 25 |
Robustness Testing
| New | Open | In progress | Near Done | Done | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current status | 43 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 32 | 8 | 2 |
Performance Testing
| New | Open | In progress | Near Done | Done | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current status | 33 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 26 | 4 |
Security Testing
| New | Open | In progress | Near Done | Done | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current status | 28 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 9 |
